IntermediateChatGPT / Claude
Write SQL that I can check
Schema: [paste the relevant tables and columns].
Question: [what you want to know].
Write the query, then explain in plain language what each join does and what it would do to the row count. State explicitly whether any join can multiply rows.
If the question is ambiguous given the schema, say which interpretation you chose.
For: Analyst
IntermediateClaude / ChatGPT
Interpret a correlation without overclaiming
I found that [variable A] and [variable B] correlate at [value] across [sample].
Tell me what can and cannot be concluded. Specifically:
- Three plausible explanations other than A causing B
- What would distinguish between them
- Whether the sample is large enough for this to mean anything
Do not write a sentence that implies causation anywhere in the answer.
For: Analyst
IntermediateChatGPT / Claude
Find what is wrong with a dataset before trusting it
Here is a sample of the data: [paste it]. It is supposed to represent [what it represents].
Look for signs that it does not: impossible values, suspiciously round numbers, gaps that line up with weekends or deploys, columns where a default has been stored as a real value, and categories that should be mutually exclusive but are not.
List what you found and what each would do to an analysis.
For: Analyst
IntermediateChatGPT / Claude
Design the aggregation before running it
I want to measure [metric] for [population] over [period].
Before any query, pin down: what counts as one unit, how to handle entities that appear partway through the period, what to do with nulls, and whether to count events or distinct entities.
Give me the decisions as a list. I will confirm them, then you write the query.
For: Analyst
IntermediateChatGPT / Claude
Explain a result to someone who will act on it
Here is an analysis result: [paste it]. The reader is [role] and will decide [decision].
Write four sentences: what the number is, what it means for the decision, how confident they should be, and what would change the answer.
No methodology unless it changes how much they should trust the result.
For: Analyst