Cloning a voice — designing the consent
Two clauses cause almost all the real problems: withdrawal, and what happens when the person leaves.
AI Tools Hub Editorial · published · updated
What the consent must state
- Who provided the voice
- The specific permitted use — not "internal use"
- A duration, not indefinite
- Whether it may be shared with third parties
- What happens if they withdraw consent
- What happens when they leave the organisation
Be specific about use
A voice contributed for training-video narration later answering sales calls is outside what the person agreed to, whatever the paperwork says. Add uses by taking additional consent; asking for blanket consent up front raises the refusal rate.
Build the withdrawal path
Without a route to say stop, the original consent was not freely given. Decide in advance what happens to already-published material — typically new generation halts and published assets remain — and agree that in writing.
When to disclose
Internal training rarely needs it. Customer-facing conversation, especially voice response, should not create a situation where someone believes they are speaking to a person. The test is whether they would feel misled on finding out.
Do not clone other people
Imitating a public figure or a professional voice actor carries rights and reputational exposure regardless of technical feasibility. Restrict yourself to synthetic library voices and consenting employees.
Storage and deletion
The voice model is personal data. Limit who can access it and add "delete the voice model" to your offboarding checklist.
FAQ
What about my own voice?
Personal use is straightforward. For company work, settle what happens to the model after you leave before you build anything with it.