
Perplexity
by Perplexity AI4.7
Perplexity answers with the sources attached. That makes it the right tool for the stage before you write something down — checking current facts, scoping competitors, verifying a claim you are about to put in a document.
- Commercial use OK
- Japanese UI
- Free tier
- Enterprise contract

- Pricing
- $20/mo
- Free tier
- Free tier
- Vendor
- Perplexity AI
- Commercial use
- Permitted
- Japanese UI
- Yes
- Enterprise contract
- Available
What it is good for
- Research you will have to defend with a citation
- Competitive and market scoping
- Fact-checking before something goes into a deliverable
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- Every answer carries source URLs
- Pro at $20/mo switches between GPT, Claude and Gemini models
- Spaces keep research threads organised by topic
- Business plans add SOC 2, team sharing and SSO
Trade-offs
- Conversational depth and writing tone trail general-purpose LLMs
- Intended as the research entry point, not the drafting tool
Editors' review
AI search with citations — the fact-checking layer before you write
Perplexity is built so that generated answers always carry source URLs. That is exactly what you want when researching current information, scoping competitors, or confirming something before it goes into an internal document.
Pro is $20/mo and lets you switch between GPT, Claude and Gemini class models. Spaces organise research history by theme. Business plans add SOC 2 compliance, team sharing and SSO.
It is weaker than a general-purpose LLM at sustained conversation and at writing in a particular voice. The established pattern is to research in Perplexity and hand the writing to Claude or ChatGPT.
Verdict
The first choice for researchers, writers and consultants who want something better than a search engine. Assume the writing happens elsewhere.
Compiled from official documentation and public sources, with our own editorial judgement. We do not publish figures we cannot source.