Lindy
4.3
Lindy builds AI assistants that stay resident on your work rather than waiting in a chat window. You describe the job in no-code — triage this inbox, join these meetings and write the notes, update the CRM after a call — and the assistant runs on triggers from then on. It is aimed at the roles where the work is repetitive but the judgement is not quite mechanical.
- Commercial use OK
- Free tier
- Pricing
- $49.99/mo
- Free tier
- Free tier
- Commercial use
- Permitted
- Japanese UI
- Not confirmed
- Enterprise contract
- Not confirmed
What it is good for
- Inbox triage and drafted replies that a human approves
- Meeting notes that land in the CRM without anyone copying them across
- Sales and support follow-ups that depend on what was said
- Small teams with no engineer to build the same thing in-house
Strengths and trade-offs
Strengths
- No-code: the person who owns the process can build the assistant
- Runs on triggers and schedules instead of needing to be prompted
- Covers email, calendar and CRM in one assistant
- Free tier to test whether the automation is worth paying for
Trade-offs
- Connecting it to email and CRM means granting broad access to business data
- Fixed per-seat pricing is steep for occasional use
- Less control than building the same flow in n8n or a script
Editors' review
Automation for the jobs that are repetitive but not quite mechanical
Most automation tools assume the steps are known in advance. Lindy targets the cases where they are not quite — replying to an email that could go three ways, writing a meeting note that has to pick out what mattered — and wraps them in a no-code builder so the person who owns the process can set it up.
The useful pattern is assistant-drafts, human-approves. Inbox triage with a suggested reply, meeting notes pushed into the CRM, follow-ups that reflect what was actually discussed: each saves a few minutes many times a day, which adds up faster than a single large automation.
Two cautions. It only works by holding credentials for your email, calendar and CRM, which is a real decision rather than a formality, and the per-seat price assumes daily use. For a workflow that already has fixed steps, n8n or Zapier will be cheaper and more transparent.
Verdict
Worth a trial if inbox and meeting admin is eating hours. Check the data access question before rolling it out to a team.
Compiled from official documentation and public sources, with our own editorial judgement. We do not publish figures we cannot source.